Seek`N`Destroy vs Deathless (3318 views)
slajdan
immoo
LavOd
danL
crAsh
naxi
10.02.08 22:00 CET
| Status: | Finished |  Get Button LinksHTML: BBCode: |
| Game: |  Enemy Territory |
|
| Rating: |
|
|
| League: | Re-play Cup | |
| Hosting: | GamesTV.org | |
| Manager: |  synt3r (Generaladmin) |
|
| Maps: | Supply | |
| Sw_goldrush_te |
Broadcasted by
 Enemy Territory TV
|
||||
 |
 #LoFT ETTV3By: benJi (ettvd) |
88.198.7.203:27953 |
100
|
|
 |
#re-play ETTV ONE By: synt3r (ettvd) |
88.198.26.100:27960 |
26
|
|
Total Slots: Auto
Viewer Peak: 32
Viewer Peak: 32
Comments
Sux0r
Sunday, 10th February 2008 21:48
gl deathless
gl deathless :)
wtf
gl deathless
gl deathless
wtf
gl lavod + slajdan
EDIT: MIJN WALLIE WALLIE WALIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE <3 NATUURLIJK
vorige x zat er een retarded wallie op vent dus ik d8 dat hij dat wss was
EDIT: MIJN WALLIE WALLIE WALIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE <3 NATUURLIJK
vorige x zat er een retarded wallie op vent dus ik d8 dat hij dat wss was
he en je negervriend dan?
why are the d brothers saying wtf?
didn't know there was ettv
but now I get the chance to fuck up something on ettv again!
but now I get the chance to fuck up something on ettv again!
so I'll be your shrink again, I'm still all ear man
omg im from switzerland not austria WTF :S
snow told me that u are austria
snow is a rtard !
thx for change :)
gl lavod
Good luck naxi ;) <3 ^^
wpgg x)
lold xiits
score ?
<3 immoo and crAsh ;)
crAsh ;)
that idiot prydz is lagging enough, he doesn't have to use aditional scripts tbh
Quit the whine, it's mental only and MS have already proved that.
mental? why is he changing packets to 60 when he shoots and when he doesn't they are 100 if it's mental? any reason to that? why doesn't he imagine he is changing them if it's mental?
I'm not saying he lagged cos of that alone, but what's the point in having that?
I'm not saying he lagged cos of that alone, but what's the point in having that?
Let's force every netsetting to max, no whine then.
you still dodge answering my question, as did he last 2 times I played vs him
I'm ok with lower settings, for all I care he could've had 15k rate and 40 packets, but then have them all the time, don't use some shit script
I'm ok with lower settings, for all I care he could've had 15k rate and 40 packets, but then have them all the time, don't use some shit script
tbh i'm VERY VERY VERY NICE TO HIT
Its easy bash to hit me.. everyone says that..
I'm belgian, 48 ping and maxpackets 100
If u whine already @ me, what about polaks etc then :s :)
anyway, gg
Its easy bash to hit me.. everyone says that..
I'm belgian, 48 ping and maxpackets 100
If u whine already @ me, what about polaks etc then :s :)
anyway, gg
yes, maxpackets 100, too bad they magically go to 60 when you shoot right?
nice whine for nothing
it's not for nothing, I just hate ppl using that shit
Its same if someone play with fov 90 *advantage*
You can use that 'shit' afaik
seta attack1 "+attack; cl_maxpackets 40 "
seta attack2 "-attack; cl_maxpackets 100"
bind mouse1 "+vstr attack1 attack2"
or
seta attack1 "+attack; cl_maxpackets 100 "
seta attack2 "-attack; cl_maxpackets 40"
bind mouse1 "+vstr attack1 attack2"
here you are, i hope u will recognize the placebo effect
You can use that 'shit' afaik
seta attack1 "+attack; cl_maxpackets 40 "
seta attack2 "-attack; cl_maxpackets 100"
bind mouse1 "+vstr attack1 attack2"
or
seta attack1 "+attack; cl_maxpackets 100 "
seta attack2 "-attack; cl_maxpackets 40"
bind mouse1 "+vstr attack1 attack2"
here you are, i hope u will recognize the placebo effect
and what's the point of that? it's like I say someone cheats and you tell me "You can use that 'shit' afaik"
come on
and it's not same as playing with fov 90, I think you mixed something there
come on
and it's not same as playing with fov 90, I think you mixed something there
if you cant see the point in this script, then why do you have problem with this ? You cannot compare a script to a cheat. By the way i dont really know how fast maxpackets can change, maybe it has some delay.
One question: Your problem is the maxpacket change or the low maxpackets ?
edit: I thought ur problem is you have disadvantage against 'maxpacket changers'..
One question: Your problem is the maxpacket change or the low maxpackets ?
edit: I thought ur problem is you have disadvantage against 'maxpacket changers'..
I'm not comparing script to a cheat, I'm pointing at the attitude
It's shit that we are making the earth more and more unhabitable for us, but who are gonna stop us?
need me and raskl tbh
better luck next time :(
